mickael pietrus
"It's no secret that the Mavericks have thought Pietrus is the sort of player that would fit well in coach Avery Johnson's system. When he was a restricted free agent this off-season, the Mavericks made the obligatory calls to Pietrus' agent if for nothing else than to kick the tires.
Could Pietrus' start on Wednesday have been a chance to showcase him for the Mavericks? "
Eddie Sefko thinks so.
Career avg 8.7 pts, 44% shooting.
Think Mavs are still interested? Seems like Ju.Howard and Hassell are busts. He definitely has athleticism in spades.
Reader Submitted
23 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Hmm
Here's the problem- what do we have that they want? Sure, Hassel and Fazekas for Pietrus and Perovic works. But why would they do it?
More likely they'll want George and Jones. While that makes the Mavs better on paper, I'm not sure that it makes them more likely to win the championship by messing with chemistry.
i've never even heard of perovic

I hope not.
If Nellie would take Fazekas and Hassel and JuHo and a wheelbarrow full of Bud Light for him, then yeah ship 'em off. He still ain't gettin' 35 min. a night.
by DitchThePlaybook on Jan 3, 2008 2:26 PM CST up reply actions
To be clear
the key is dj mbenga

Secret Agent Mbenga!
One problem
Yes well
(and is it me, or have we absolutely shattered the all time, during work, no game going on, comments for the day?)
now

I'm not so sure about that.
After reading the majority of comments on the GSoM blog that Wes mentioned from the game, it makes me appreciate the fact that a large percentage of the comments here on this site are from people who have something insightful to say about basketball. Maybe some in-game threads are exempt, but hey....
Not all of the SB Nation blogs have this luxury. :)
by DitchThePlaybook on Jan 3, 2008 3:34 PM CST up reply actions
I'd love it
by cody7717 on Jan 3, 2008 1:12 PM CST reply actions
one of them

Would that be...
Pietrus was a surprise draft pick. I seem to recall Ridnour and Collison were both still on the board, and the Warriors had been linked to them. In any case, Pietrus was considered very athletic, very raw, and perhaps a little light on the basketball IQ. Unfortunately, all of those things have appeared to be true, and for the most part remain so to this point.
In a certain sense, I almost feel like he's regressed while he's been in Golden State. His rookie year he looked like such a phenomenal on ball defender, and showed such power and flash getting to the rim, that I actually advocated trading Jason Richardson and making Mickael the starting 2 guard. But as time went on, his play became more erratic, and I realized that what I had witnessed was more likely a prolonged hot streak, or inspired play sparked by the beginning of his career.
So, here's the nitty gritty... Pietrus can play defense, and do so very effectively. I've seen him play Kobe Bryant admirably and skillfully. Problem is, he's also not terribly smart, and he gets baited into a lot of fouls, some far from the basket (I think it was such a call that killed our momentum against you guys, him and Mbenga) in inexcusable circumstances.
He's not good with the ball in his hands. Once again, he seemed more proficient at creating his own shot before Don Nelson took over, but even watching him dribble upcourt in a fast break scenario can be harrowing. Something he's particularly guilty of is not being able to make his mind up as he goes to the basket whether to dunk or layup or pass, which leads to awkward fumbling and turnovers.
His shooting ability comes and goes, and is probably a little better than people give him credit for. He's got a dead-eye shot from the corner on the near sideline. If a defender closes out quickly on him, though, he has developed a habit of pump faking and hopping to one side before launching a fadeaway jumper, which both brings him inside the three point line and is so awkward that I've only seen him hit it once (against you guys).
Also, he travels. He travels a lot, and it's always the unforced, taking a step before the first dribble kind. Anytime he catches the ball outside the arc and tries to make a move, I hold my breath.
That said, it could well be that he's just not cut out for the kind of team the Warriors are, and he could be a great player in a more structured system. He's supposed to be a very goofy, energetic and beloved personality on the team, for what that's worth. I can honestly say, though, that I'd probably do the swap for Hassell if Dallas threw in a 2nd rounder, that's just me.
by Zack Vank on Jan 4, 2008 12:20 AM CST up reply actions
From that roundup
Given that, I hope the Mavs don't make the move.
Good breakdown.
As for working under another system, guys who have a 'low basketball IQ' don't tend to last very long around coaches like Pops and AJ.
by DitchThePlaybook on Jan 4, 2008 10:07 AM CST up reply actions
Thanks for the Insight
by cody7717 on Jan 4, 2008 8:19 AM CST up reply actions
Well...
About Nelson... interestingly enough, Nelson seems to have a longer leash on Pietrus than you'd expect, given the shortcomings in his game. In fact, Nelson opened the season playing Pietrus as the starting power forward, and whgile he's acknowledged in interviews that he isn't that smart a player, he's done so tactfully, unlike when he called Mike Dunleavy "the dumbest 'smart' player I've ever seen."
In all honesty, I could see Pietrus doing very well for a team like Orlando or Toronto that has a young, athletic big who can free up shots for him. I'm not sure if Dirk would free up many shots for him, and while he might be the best defensive 2/3 you'd have, he also has an atrocious foul rate, as you can see being discussed here: http://goldenstateofmind.com/story/2008/1/3/1540/68530
by Zack Vank on Jan 4, 2008 6:55 PM CST reply actions

by 

















