Michael Redd

by supafly205 on Jul 19, 2010 10:49 PM CDT

anybody know what the story with Michael Redd is? he was once a potential all-star kinda player. If we could get him for relatively cheap, why not sign him? There is probably someone here with some more insight about him, so please share. I am pretty sure he is a free agent, and could probably be a good help to a team, but I haven't heard anyone mention him at all. certainly better than nothing.

Reader Submitted

Tweet Comment 14 comments | 0 recs |

Do you like this story?

Comments

MICHAEL REDD NOT A F/A

PLUS HE’S NOT GOING TO PLAYING UNTIL FEB 2011

by ray allen a mav on Jul 19, 2010 11:27 PM CDT reply actions

Aside from the caps,

I do believe he is under contract until the 2011 year. Not a bad idea however. He could be a solid SG off the bench. If anyone remembers, he has the prettiest shot in the league. I know it’s irrelevant. All that matters is if it goes in, but this guys shot is perfect textbook.

Thats your random comment of the day, thank you for playing!

~Karim!

by KarimTheDream on Jul 19, 2010 11:37 PM CDT up reply actions

why are you yelling, I am a foot from you?

by blueballlefty on Jul 20, 2010 12:27 AM CDT up reply actions

blueballlefty

meet ray allen a mav. he yells a lot.

by LJRotter on Jul 20, 2010 11:44 PM CDT up reply actions

Lisa,

Meet karimthedream. He loves puppies

~Karim!

by KarimTheDream on Jul 21, 2010 12:57 PM CDT up reply actions

uh, WHO DOESN'T, Karim?

by LJRotter on Jul 21, 2010 7:13 PM CDT up reply actions

Cats?

and cruella deville.

~Karim!

by KarimTheDream on Jul 21, 2010 10:09 PM CDT up reply actions

Redd is not a free agent, is extremely overpaid and hasn’t played basketball in a long time. The Bucks would give him away for nothing if they could.

by mg4tx on Jul 19, 2010 11:43 PM CDT reply actions

at this point if you could the contracts to match up then it could be a decent low risk move seeing as he only has one year left

by blueballlefty on Jul 20, 2010 12:28 AM CDT up reply actions

No

Seriously, NO.

What kinda contracts would that be? We’d need to dump expiring on their asses PLUS picks ‘cus the Bucks have a plan for that cap space and don’t need to let Redd go. Anyway he won’t be able to even practice until Feb so why?

Anybody that honestly follows the NBA should know this is a dumb idea (and I really like(d) Redd before he became gimp).

by CarloEscobar on Jul 20, 2010 6:15 PM CDT up reply actions

The bucks probably would

I read an article that Micheal Redd had to have knee surgery. I’ve been trying to find that article again so I can post it.

by 12mavericks on Jul 20, 2010 3:23 PM CDT up reply actions

I could see the Bucks trading Redd

But I don’t think we have the right pieces to get it done and still make the team better. To make salaries match, we’d have to at least trade Chandler or Butler, both of whom would produce more for the team than Redd. The only other option would be Terry-Stevenson-Barea-Ajinca (when he can be traded with other players), but even then the Bucks would want picks and/or money to make the trade palatable.

by JoeyJoeJoeJr.Shabadoo on Jul 20, 2010 3:35 PM CDT reply actions