Grading the Mavs' season: Shawn Marion
After grading Jason Kidd, it seems that most of MMB thought favorably of him this past season, giving him mainly 7’s and 8’s. Now we get onto the next player on our report card, Shawn Marion.
On another note, the remaining players I have left on these are JET,
Of all the roster discussion that has gone on in this past season,
Positives:
Negatives: At 32,
My Grade: I’m going to give him a 7. I think the part that most people overlook in regards to
Outlook: Look for
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
IMO, a 7 is fit for him.
As he was decent on offense and relied often on Kidd’s playmaking abilities, his defense is actually good. I never really had the chance of extensively seeing his whole game before he came here, other than in that two years Dallas played Phoenix in the playoffs (where he played many minutes in the 4 position); but I have to say that I am quite impressed of his overall play. As far as I am remember, Dallas never really had that lockdown defender for years. We already have one but unfortunately ours is someone who is already on the back side of his career.
"The idea is not to block every shot. The idea is to make your opponent believe that you might block every shot." - Bill Russell
Glad that Marion's a Mav
But Shawn’s got to figure out a way to finish at the rim. I don’t think I can count the number of times he got a steal, ran the fastbreak, and missed an easy lay-up.
Agree with this
He was a terrific finisher with Phoenix. Maybe it’s just age? Conditioning? Confidence? Whatever it is, he has the whole offseason to address it.
"The idea is not to block every shot. The idea is to make your opponent believe that you might block every shot." - Bill Russell
by Marjun Raposon on Aug 2, 2010 6:36 PM CDT up reply actions
4
I think he’s a great defensive player but last season was so inconsistent offensively he could not be counted on to play heavy minutes. Seems if he could develop some kind of consistent 16’ or 18’ shot that would enhance his offensive performance measurably.
Marion's role
I have no problem with Marion other then he is over paid this season by a little and a lot over the next few years. I would really like to see him as our 7th guy. I dont want Marion playing 35 minutes a game for us.
I guess I'm the only Maverick fan
who just straight up does not like Shawn Marion. With the money we’re paying him, and the minutes we give him I just don’t feel he needs to be on our roster.
I’m sure all you you will be giving me a thousand reasons why he is a great fit, but I just don’t see it. Something about this guy, I’m not sure what, makes me uneasy. I think it’s his salary. We should not have taken in that kind of contract for his talent.
I welcome, and expect, all of you to give me a bunch of reasons why he’s here, but it’s just something about him, I don’t like him. Don’t mean to be stubborn here.
~Karim!
I don't like him either.
I didn’t like bringing him in at that contract and I thought there were several games that he just killed momentum with turnovers and missed layups that should have been easy buckets. I will give him some credit for his defense at times, but I thought he was extremely questionable last year down the stretch and that he played very poorly against the Spurs.
If I had a nickel for every Super Bowl the Eagles have won, I would have zero nickels.
by Cowboyfan729 on Aug 3, 2010 11:14 PM CDT up reply actions
I gave the guy a 6...
but in a way I think I’m somewhat generous in that. Sure, it’s nice to have a defender like him on the squad but I would like to see him figure out how to finish at the rim as mentioned above. Maybe part of my dislike is over the contract too, I’ve just never been really impressed with him. He’s like a poor mans Ron Artest only not that cheap…
by elbow greater than face on Aug 3, 2010 3:07 AM CDT reply actions
i can understand disliking the guy for his play since it was pretty lackluster
but don’t blame the guy for getting a lucrative contract. blame the person(s) who gave it to him. his play in miami and toronto, respectively, was clearly less than the standard he set in phoenix, but it was up to management to not fall in love with the idea of a player, and look at him objectively.
the mavs panicked and thought he was an important addition to the team, so they overpaid for something they thought they were desperately needing. let’s hope that haywood doesn’t fill such a role this upcoming season.
i think marion is a really good role player who gets a lot of flak for what he doesn’t do, which is play the game with finesse. he can’t create, but he mops up; and on a team full of chuck-the-ball-from-halfcourt players, that’s an unappreciated job sometimes.
I'm about to infect you with the back of my hand.
6... and that was being nice
Marion has been a perennial all-star, and although everyone expected it taking 30 or so games for him to get his wheels back, I was very disappointed, especially in the playoffs. He disappeared at times, occasionally reappearing to blow bunny lay-ups. We need a lot more out of him this year.
Greetings from the Humungus, the Ruler of the Wasteland, the Ayatollah of Rock and Roll-A. I laugh at your puny plans.
I'd give him a 7
I think he is generally mismanaged by Carlisle. There were moments where, no joke, Marion was flat out the best thing the Mavs had going in terms of scoring from the post.
He gets a very solid amount of chances to finish right at the basket, he just has a knack for missing them more than you would like.
Either way, Marion’s defense is something that can easily be under appreciated in a hurry.
by Bryan Gutierrez on Aug 9, 2010 12:53 AM CDT reply actions

by 


















