2014 Mavericks Draft Primer: Second round prospects to watch

Jerome Miron-USA TODAY Sports

Some names to keep in mind for the 2014 NBA Draft, and a breakdown of the Dallas Mavericks' recent draft history. Warning: those with weak stomachs are advised to take precautions before reading this.

The 2014 NBA Draft will be held on Thursday, June 26th, which you might have noticed is less than two weeks away.

With the NBA Finals going a little later into the month of June than usual, media attention has not yet switched from LeBron and Duncan to Wiggins and Embiid, but for NBA front offices, draft-fever is already in full swing.

The Dallas Mavericks do not own a first-round pick this year, as the Mavericks played just well enough to send their top-20 protected pick to the Oklahoma City Thunder (it's complicated, but the pick was initially sent to the Lakers as part of the Lamar Odom deal, before going to Houston and then finally OKC).  However, by many accounts this is expected to be a deep draft, and with an early second rounder from Boston, Dallas has a chance to add a quality piece to their roster.

Of course, the Mavericks are known as wheelers and dealers, and especially on draft night.  You have to go back to 2006 to find the last time the Mavericks stayed at their actual draft spot and simply picked someone (poor Mo Ager). Since then we've seen Dallas:

1) trade their picks for established veterans like Jason Kidd and Erick Dampier

2) trade back for extra selections like they've done the last two years

3) buy a first round pick(Dominique Jones)

and

4) whatever you'd call their strategy in 2011, when they traded their pick for Rudy Fernandez then immediately decided they didn't want Fernandez and traded him (and Corey Brewer) to Denver for basically nothing.

In the middle part of the 2000s, when Dallas boasted quality young draftees like Devin Harris and Josh Howard, as well as undrafted gems like Marquise Daniels and J.J. Barea, I was a defender of the Maverick draft resume.  That position has become increasingly more difficult to occupy.  To put it bluntly, Dallas has made some pretty strange moves related to their draft picks recently.

I mentioned the Rudy Fernandez whirlwind maneuvering, but perhaps most embarrassingly last year Dallas traded back in the draft, and included Jared Cunningham (12 months removed from being Dallas' first round selection) just for the right to do so.  Think about that for a moment.  I can't personally recall too many teams trading their previous years' first rounder to move back in the draft.

Peculiarities aside, I doubt anyone would care when or how Dallas selected players if the players actually selected were contributors. On this front, Dallas also has fallen greatly from the mid-aughts. Dallas has drafted four first round "point guards" in the last five years. Rodrigue Beaubois, Dominique Jones, Jared Cunningham and Shane Larkin. Only Larkin remains in Dallas, and even more telling, Larkin may be the only one with an NBA job next year. That's really bad.

Dallas' best draft pick in the last eight or nine years is probably second rounder Jae Crowder, which may induce nausea for some of you.  While it would be easy to blame this solely on scouting incompetence, I fear the problem may be even greater than that.  It seems that the Mavericks do not highly value the draft.  We have seen quotes referring to the process as "a crap shoot", and that attitude is certainly reflected in the teams' approach, which could be aptly described as "punting". In the new landscape of the NBA that requires smaller market clubs to spend wisely, draft picks are more highly valued around the league than ever, which makes it all the more strange to see Dallas wading upstream, against the current.

Now, this pattern can be easily broken, and as the Dirk era winds down, I certainly hope it will. Good young players are so critical for winning teams because they are cheap and they can remain under team control for a really long time. As the Spurs finish off their dismantling of the Heat, think about where they'd be without Kawhi Leonard and Tiago Splitter.

I'll break down some names worth keeping your eye on, for now. Though they are mostly projected second rounders, my lengthy preamble should serve as a reminder that with Dallas and the draft, anything can happen, so take all this with a grain of salt.  Later in the week I will take a look at some possible mid-to-late first rounders that might be trade-up candidates.

Jordan Adams, Sophomore SG, UCLA

For now this is a player that seems to be projected as a late first or early second rounder, but that could change. Jordan Adams had initially stated he would return to UCLA for his junior season, only to reverse course soon after. Depending on where he ends up being drafted, this may not have been the right move, but I must confess Adams is one of my favorite players in this draft.

Adams led a talented Bruins squad in scoring this past season, building on a strong freshman campaign in which he surprised more than a few people.  Adams is not the most impressive player to look at.  A 6-foot-4 guard with a dumpy body and an offensive game based more on angles and know-how than explosiveness, Adams is productive thanks to a well-rounded game and great basketball IQ.

Adams best assets physically are his long arms and strength, which allow him to get to the basket (despite average speed) and finish (despite average leaping ability), or get fouled. Those arms also help him corral offensive rebounds as well as any shooting guard prospect, and rack up steals on defense. A streaky shooter, Adams does better in catch and shoot situations than creating off the dribble.

This is probably way too high praise for Adams but he reminds me a little of James Harden. Harden came out of college with a rep as a B-grade athlete, but in truth I think Harden is significantly more athletic than most give him credit for, and probably a lot more explosive than Adams. Still, you see a similar body type, size and skillset. A more practical comparison might be Dion Waiters. How both those guys went top 5, while Adams is currently being mentioned as a late first round pick, I don't know.

Isaiah Austin, Sophomore PF/C, Baylor

(editor's note: since the writing of this article, Isaiah Austin has discovered a genetic condition that has forced him to end his NBA career.)

Isaiah Austin arrived at Baylor as one of country's most highly recruited players, but like Perry Jones before him, Austin had two years of middling production before declaring for the draft, and remains an alluring but frustrating mix of size, skill and athleticism.

Austin is a legitimate 7-footer, with a 7-foot-4.5 wingspan (the largest measured at the combine this year).  Though he shot under 30 percent from three this season, he has a good-looking stroke and appears more comfortable out on the perimeter than playing inside.  He handles the ball as well as any college player his size -- maybe ever -- and in time could be a stretch four or stretch five candidate.

Now the problems: Austin has never played up to his talent level (at least not consistently), and what's worse is that he looks like he's taken steps back rather than steps forward.  His shooting and scoring declined both in percentages and raw totals.  His rebounding, which was solid if unspectacular as a freshman, dropped to embarrassing levels for someone his size as a sophomore.  At 220 pounds, Austin is rail thin and gets pushed around far too easily at both ends.  There was one area in which Austin clearly improved in year two, however and that's as a shot blocker.  While Austin isn't the most physical guy, his outstanding length helped him to block over three shots per game.  Also worth noting: Austin is legally blind in his right eye.

If he can add strength, Austin has the physical tools to be a very good defender, and that combined with his guard-like skillset on offense makes him one of the most unique prospects in the draft.  He's a serious project, but Austin does have a lot of attributes that you just can't teach.

Spencer Dinwiddie, Junior SG, Colorado

A bubble first-round prospect to start the year, Dinwiddie tore his ACL 17 games into the season, an injury that is expected to keep him out until the start of training camp.

Dinwiddie isn't necessarily the sexiest basketball prospect, but from a fit perspective he might be the most interesting guy for Dallas outside the top 20.  He's probably a 2 in the NBA, but he can pass pretty well at 6-foot-6 and may land with a team willing to try him out at point guard.  In college, he defended both guard spots well, posted one of the best assist/turnover ratios from a major conference wing and shot nearly 40 percent from three. That's maybe the perfect partner for Monta Ellis.

He's not a great athlete, so I don't think he'll be able to consistently create offense for himself at the next level.  His injury also hurts him as 1) it didn't give us a chance to see how legitimate his statistical gains were, and 2) it clouds a future that already had little margin for error.  I think he's a realistic option for Dallas in the actual draft, but even if healthy he might be just a decent role player rather than a true starter.  Still, you wonder if Dinwiddie isn't flying a bit under the radar right now.  He may not be a highlight-quality prospect, but looking at his game tape you see that there isn't a lot he doesn't do.

Jarnell Stokes, Junior PF, Tennessee

Built like a firetruck at 6-foot-8 and 260 pounds, Jarnell Stokes was an honor student in high school and actually enrolled early at Tennessee. He won't turn 21 until next January, making him the youngest players in his junior class (and younger than several players from the sophomore class).

Those who watched the NCAA tournament saw Stokes almost single-handedly take the Volunteers to the Elite Eight. He took over late in the play-in game against Iowa and crushed an undersized UMass team in the second round, and through the first three games, he scored 61 points and grabbed 45 rebounds.

The issues for Stokes start with the fact that he's a little short for a PF, and almost certainly too small to play center.  He tested better than expected at the combine (with a max vertical of 36 inches), but overall he's not an exceptionally great athlete.  He's also somewhat close to falling into the "chunky" category, creating questions about his conditioning and how well he can hold up over a grueling 82-game schedule.

However, Stokes is one of the best rebounders in the country, especially on the offensive boards, which is one of the skills that best translates to the NBA success.  Stokes also has a nice post game and knows how to use his bulk to create space in the paint.  In his three years at Tennessee, Stokes saw his assist rate rise and his turnover rate fall each season, and he's even improved as a free throw shooter (57 percent as a freshman to 70 percent as a junior), giving hope that he can eventually develop a passable midrange game.

If a team can help Stokes improve his body and shed some pounds, I think he can be a player in the late first/early second. He's smart, tough and has an NBA-ready body, and, at 20, he has more room for improvement than the average junior.

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Mavs Moneyball

You must be a member of Mavs Moneyball to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Mavs Moneyball. You should read them.

Join Mavs Moneyball

You must be a member of Mavs Moneyball to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Mavs Moneyball. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9347_tracker