Stat of the Day

by Wes Cox on Apr 25, 2007 3:27 PM CDT in News

If the Mavericks put even more of a defensive emphasis on Davis, do they run the risk that Jason Richardson, Monta Ellis or Al Harrington gets untracked? Are the Warriors a more dangerous team when the offensive wealth is spread among four to five players or when it's concentrated in Davis' hands?

Golden State's Records During the Regular Season:

Without Baron Davis: 6-13 (.316)
With Baron Davis: 36-27 (.571)
When Davis Scored Under 20: 16-15 (.516)
When Davis Scored Over 20: 20-12 (.625)

0 recs | Comment 5 comments

Read Related

Story-email Email | Print |

Comments

Those number are misleading

The warriors playing without BD in the game is totally different than having the defense focus on taking BD out of the game.

by twizm on Apr 25, 2007 4:22 PM CDT 0 recs

Yes, obviously.

but it still shows his importance, and the importance of his scoring, in relation to the teams success.

by Wes Cox on Apr 25, 2007 4:30 PM CDT up 0 recs

That would be why

Wes included the second set of numbers...

by BrodyV on Apr 25, 2007 4:30 PM CDT up 0 recs

Also,

Golden State was 7-0 when Davis scored over 30

by Wes Cox on Apr 25, 2007 4:45 PM CDT 0 recs

Baron Davis...

No matter what Baron does, as long as he's suited for the game our team goes hard. However, there were times during the season when we didn't have BD, our offense looked lost. He's our floor general/leader. Even if Dallas focused on stopping him, other's would eventually step up. The best way to probably guard the DUBS is to let them shoot the 3 ball. All our guys love to shoot the 3 and most of the time its our downfall. We can easily shoot ourself out of the game but at the same time blow a team out if we're making them.

by ON THE RUN on Apr 25, 2007 5:50 PM CDT 0 recs