Maybe Mavs Fans AREN'T Crazy!
According to this article by Murray Weiss in the New York Post today, the FBI has been investigating for more than a year an NBA official for betting on his own games.
The official, whose name was withheld, allegedly wagered on games during the 2005-06 and 2006-07 NBA seasons.
The sources indicated the referee apparently had a gambling problem, slipped into debt and fell prey to mob thugs.
"That's how he got himself into this predicament" by wagering with mob-connected bookies, one source said.
10 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Odds
Derek
A quick google search for the odds
Prior to the finals, oddsmaker Jeremy Ryan of Sportsbook.com explained, "The Mavericks do have homecourt advantage and appear to be the better all-around team heading into the finals."
After winning the first two games of the series in double-digit fashion, the Mavericks were listed as high as $6.00 favorites (Bet $600 to win $100) to clinch the finals.
<snip>
The $25,000 question remains, "What happens in Game 5?"
Miami opened as a two-point favorite for its final home playoff game at American Airlines Arena on Sunday, with the total sitting at 188. I expected the number to be a tad higher with the Mavericks Jerry Stackhouse getting a one-game suspension for a flagrant foul on Shaquille O'Neal in Thursday's contest.
Still, one would understand that a sudden bump would get serious action on Dallas. Plus, the public was all over the Mavericks in Game 4 - Dallas opened as a two-point underdog and closed as a one-point favorite, a big three-point swing. The underdog/under combination is always nice for the book.
With the odds that out of whack, and the public betting heavily on the Mavs, a fix could generate a lot of money for the mob.
Derek
by DerekSTheRed on Jul 20, 2007 10:04 AM CDT up reply actions
I knew it.
by charlesbronsonpinchot on Jul 20, 2007 11:36 AM CDT reply actions
Double Digits
Derek
p.s. I think it's Salvatore simply because of the '06 finals game 3, but I'm biased.
by DerekSTheRed on Jul 20, 2007 12:30 PM CDT up reply actions
I'm not suprised
by the dbg on Jul 20, 2007 12:18 PM CDT reply actions
Salvatore or Joey Crawford
After that, I'd say Joey Crawford. He was also in Game 5 of the '06 Finals. This development makes me think there maybe was more to his suspension this past season than just the "fighting words" that Stern cited. Seemed like the punishment didn't really fit the crime.
Just as an example, check out 82games.com's "Right Call" stats from the '06 Finals Game 5.
The disparity of calls that Salvatore made that favored the Heat vs. the lack of calls he made favoring the Mavs is eye opening. Especially vs. the calls from his fellow officiators favoring either team. Something definitely smells rotten with this.
No way
An NBA ref has never knowingly attempted to influence the outcome of an NBA game.
Nope.
Never.
Reaction
But even fans of other teams seem to have suspected something was fishy. It's almost as if rigging the games was an open secret to everyone. That hurts the league just as much as the investigation. Now every fan will question every call of every ref as if the guy was paid to go against them. It will be similar to baseball where any time a player does well, people ask if he's on the juice. It will take a long time till the NBA repairs its reputation.
Derek
Completely Agree.
You're crazy
Seriously.
Forget Mavs-Heat.
Go back and watch the Heat-Pistons series from '06. That was way worse than even the Mavs-Heat.
Go back and watch the Kings-Lakers playoff battles.
Or the Lakers-Blazers.
The league is f***ed.
I wish I didn't love basketball so much so I could just stop watching.
by thedirkatron on Jul 20, 2007 4:12 PM CDT up reply actions

by 

















